Kamala Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 This is a picture of Smithsonian - Staircase architecture is beautiful. I want to submit this to a local gallery show (juried). Critique please and inputs for improvement is greatly appreciated. Thanks! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Parsons Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 Very nice example of interior architecture - good composition, well exposed. Couple of minor suggestions - could the bright highlight top centre be eliminated or toned down, either by cropping or cloning? Also, would the image benefit from being less contrasty, retain more of the details in the shadows ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcstep Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 (edited) I'm torn about the contrast. As is, I think it emphasizes the stair. If they hired you to take this image, you'd ditch the crowd control ropes and the sign, but you can't do that. There's lots of natural light coming in. I wonder how that'd change earlier or later. It's beautiful but reflects the "in use" status. Maybe someone going up or coming down the stair would pull even more attention to the stair, as is. As I said, "torn." I want to see the stair as a beautiful work of art, without the distraction of the sign and ropes, but if I can't have that, maybe I want to see it in use. Edited February 26 by dcstep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamala Posted February 28 Author Share Posted February 28 On 2/26/2024 at 8:29 AM, Tony Parsons said: Very nice example of interior architecture - good composition, well exposed. Couple of minor suggestions - could the bright highlight top centre be eliminated or toned down, either by cropping or cloning? Also, would the image benefit from being less contrasty, retain more of the details in the shadows ? Thanks, Tony. I can eliminate the bright highlight. I tried playing with contrast, reducing contrast makes it shiny rather than extract details. There is not much texture to the 'railing' and hence the darker tones. Ropes, I could not help. I have a portrait version to get rid of ropes, but the composition isn't great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamala Posted February 28 Author Share Posted February 28 On 2/26/2024 at 12:23 PM, dcstep said: I'm torn about the contrast. As is, I think it emphasizes the stair. If they hired you to take this image, you'd ditch the crowd control ropes and the sign, but you can't do that. There's lots of natural light coming in. I wonder how that'd change earlier or later. It's beautiful but reflects the "in use" status. Maybe someone going up or coming down the stair would pull even more attention to the stair, as is. As I said, "torn." I want to see the stair as a beautiful work of art, without the distraction of the sign and ropes, but if I can't have that, maybe I want to see it in use. @dcstep, Thanks for the comments and inputs. Yes, I would keep the contrast just because there isn't much details. It is too shiny even if I reduce a little bit. I went there when there was too much light. Unfortunately, this was summer and Smithsonian's open and close when there is too much light and cannot do much about it. Definitely like the idea about having someone on the staircase. Adds to the story. Ropes, I think I have to just leave it. They were all over! just couldn't avoid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Parsons Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 (edited) I don't feel the ropes are an issue here - they are a functional part of the environment. I was thinking more of lightening the areas around the plants, both those at the foot of the staircase and the ones just to the right of the notice board. I prefer the staircase without people on it - makes it more of a journey into the unknown. I'd be interested to know what focal length was used for this, please ? Edited February 28 by Tony Parsons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kucinich Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 Very nice image, Kamala. Darkening down that light at the top center I think is wise. I would like to see the bright sheen on the floor on the right side darkenend down as to my eye, it takes away from the staircase. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wogears Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 It's a nicely composed picture, but the shadows are definitely blocked. I don't know if you can raise the values, but I think it would help. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamala Posted Monday at 01:00 AM Author Share Posted Monday at 01:00 AM On 3/18/2024 at 3:26 PM, michael_kucinich said: Very nice image, Kamala. Darkening down that light at the top center I think is wise. I would like to see the bright sheen on the floor on the right side darkenend down as to my eye, it takes away from the staircase. Thanks Michael. That is true. Right side can be a little less brighter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamala Posted Monday at 01:01 AM Author Share Posted Monday at 01:01 AM On 3/18/2024 at 8:21 PM, wogears said: It's a nicely composed picture, but the shadows are definitely blocked. I don't know if you can raise the values, but I think it would help. Thanks @wogears. I can try and see how that will look. For most part, I thought this was the best tones I could get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jc1305us Posted Monday at 08:55 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:55 PM I may have shot the stairs straight on to see what that looked like, but otherwise, excellent shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmac Posted yesterday at 03:15 AM Share Posted yesterday at 03:15 AM (edited) Very nice but I think the scene needs to be shot again so that the rails etc, look less like clutter, or not shown at all. The bright light on the floor in the lower right is distracting and indiscernible from a pool of flood water. The lens flare "dots" (if that's what they are) below the stairs need to be spotted out. I agree the shadows are too deep and there's no detail in them to make them good, you're stuck with those dark shadows the way they are. Good attempt though IMO. Perhaps a few bracketed shots at a few different aperture settings, and positions, would have given you a better chance for success. Edited yesterday at 03:16 AM by kmac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
httpwww.photo.netbarry Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago I thinkI like the original due to the continuation of the staircase provides a nice graceful curve for the eye to follow and adds a little dynamism in the composition. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_ante Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago Very nice. I feel that the darkness of the plants in the lower left quarter balance the very bright upper quarter. Slight cropping of the bright light at top would also remove the top upper right quarter edge of slightly dimness, thus making that quarter brighter and balance lower left even more. If drawing one could remove ropes, etc., but unless set up still life, photographer deals with found objects. This is what makes photography both different and difficult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now